000 | 01259nam a22003137a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c5404 _d5404 |
||
001 | GENERAL-000501 | ||
003 | EC-OLADE-CDD | ||
005 | 20161207110110.0 | ||
008 | 160705b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 spa d | ||
040 |
_aOLADE-CDD _cOLADE-CDD |
||
041 | _aeng | ||
082 |
_a621.44 _bD4193 |
||
100 | _aHohmann, Gerald | ||
245 | _aModelling team report | ||
260 |
_aUtah: _bDepartament of Geology and Geophysics, _c1977 |
||
300 |
_app. 37-58 _bcuadros. |
||
500 | _aImpreso. El artículo es parte de: Workshop on electrical methods in geothermal exploration. | ||
504 | _a06663 | ||
505 | _aElectrical geophysical methods traditionally have suffered from a lack of interpretation capability. Analytic solutions for simple bodies in a whole space and scale model experiments are useful, but severely limited. However, in the past few years previously intractable electromagnetic boundary value problems have begun to yield to numerical solutions using large computers. | ||
650 | _aGeotermia | ||
650 | _aCongresos y Conferencias | ||
651 | _aEstados Unidos | ||
700 | _aAnderson, Walter | ||
700 | _aBostick, Francis | ||
700 | _aGoldstein, Norman | ||
700 | _aKasameyer, Paúl | ||
700 | _aSwift, Charles | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cMON |