000			02134nam a2200277 4500
003			OSt
008			210826b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aOLADE-CDD
041			_aeng
082			_a333.793 _bT337c
100			_aTeske, Sven
245			_aCitizen power for grids. _bCase studies on collaborative infrastructure planning processes for the energy transition.
260			_a[Lugar de publicación no identificado]: _bPAC, _c2021
300			_a29 páginas. _btablas.
336			_atexto
337			_acomputadora
338			_arecurso en línea
520			_aThis analysis focuses on the planning process for long-distance and high-voltage transmission lines and not for low-voltage distribution grids. It seeks to shed light on the organisation of grid planning processes and civil society engagement in five countries. The case studies provided do not claim to present a comprehensive overview, but offer some diverse examples from which lessons can be drawn. The European TYNDP is the oldest and most established process. The Australian ISP, although relatively new, translates the regional model of the TYNDP to the national level. The example from Vietnam is state-driven but includes as a recommendation a variety of scenarios that have been developed from civil society and academia (but not as part of the planning commission). Japan’s grid development process can be considered a mix of the Australian and Vietnamese examples, in which a committee is consulted on the scenario and on grid planning. Civil society is not directly involved but is indirectly consulted by two of the three sub-committees via specific submissions. In Chile, civil society is not involved in the scenario development, but provides inputs to the spatial planning process.
650			_aSistemas de Energía Eléctrica
650			_aPlanificación Energética
650			_aSociedad Civil
700			_aGibb, Duncan
856			_uhttp://biblioteca.olade.org/opac-tmpl/Documentos/cg01038.pdf
856			_uhttps://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/PAC_Citizen-Power-for-Grids_FINAL_WEB.pdf
942			_2ddc _cDOCD
999			_c14971 _d14971